You’ve heard of course about Trump’s 2nd Amendment “solution” to the Hillary-as-president problem that he proposed yesterday:
The intense backpedaling, as evidenced briefly in the video above, has commenced immediately and continued unabated today, with Trump’s surrogates minimizing his “gaffe” (that wasn’t) as best as they could. Their trumpsplanations have ranged from ridiculous but amusing (Trump, despite having the best words, don’t speak so good, what with not having a Ph.D. in grammar) through misguided (it was a “joke gone bad,” said Paul Ryan, unaware apparently that narcissistic psychopaths do not have a sense of humor) to patently absurd (it’s about unification, y’all!).
Trump himself attributed the debacle to a nasty media conspiracy (what else) but let the truth slip out, inadvertently and with a plausible spin, by admitting that this controversy is “a good thing for me.”
As the media and public storm rages on, let’s stop for a moment to remember that we are dealing with a con man who has had a lifetime of manipulation and abuse of others to practice his schtick. We are being had, again, and it may be instructive to examine how and why.
What Trump is doing is called gaslighting. As Christine Louis de Canonville writes on her blog,
Gaslighting is a form of psychological abuse used by narcissists in order to instill in their victim’s an extreme sense of anxiety and confusion to the point where they no longer trust their own memory, perception or judgment. The techniques used in “Gaslighting” by the narcissist are similar to those used in brainwashing, interrogation, and torture that have been used in psychological warfare by intelligence operative, law enforcement and other forces for decades.
A form of crazy-making, this abusive tactic used by “natural-born” manipulative abusers everywhere is meant to engender fear-based submission to the abuser. When used repeatedly, as it always is, it makes the victims lose a sense of reality and of their own agency and strength, sometimes even leading to sympathy for and an identification with the abuser (Stockholm Syndrome).
Gaslighting can be done on an individual and mass scale, and Trump has been doing it since the beginning of his campaign (if not before). He also does it with predictability embedded in his character defect, as these expressions of his own aggression and calls for violence from others are eruptions of narcissistic rage which follow his personal humiliations.
He incites aggression, but when called on it, denies doing it and blames “the victims” — the subjects of his aggressive remarks and/or those taking him to task for them — and immediately assumes the stance of a victim himself. Because his denials and deflections may sound plausible, people end up giving him the benefit of a doubt and he “wins.”
For a malignant narcissist*, such overt displays of aggression, followed by denials and victim blaming, are meant to meet the following objectives, immediate and long-term:
- release the pent-up rage;
- exact revenge for the “wounding” on the humiliators or their proxies, or even on unrelated subjects;
- patch up his narcissistic wound and restore the elevated (grandiose) sense of his power and importance;
- divert attention from the reason for his humiliation (his incompetence, dishonesty, etc.);
- cow the victims into submission by engendering confusion and fear (gaslighting);
- continue with whatever schemes he’s perpetrating at the moment.
This behavior is not conscious and typically is not premeditated (although it can be), but it is purposeful (see the above objectives, esp. 4 to 6).
Politico has compiled a list of Trump-the-candidate’s most egregious expressions of direct aggression / calls for violence to date. Here are a few:
At a rally in Cedar Rapids on the day of the Iowa caucuses, Trump offered to pay the legal fees of supporters who attacked anyone trying to throw fruit at him. “If you see somebody getting ready to throw a tomato, knock the crap out of them, would you? Seriously,” he said. “Just knock the hell — I promise you, I will pay for the legal fees. I promise. I promise.” As it turned out, there were no attempts to throw fruit at him at the rally.
Later in February, at a Las Vegas rally on the eve of the Nevada caucuses, Trump said of a protester, “I’d like to punch him in the face.”
“We’re not allowed to punch back any more,” Trump lamented in Las Vegas. “You know what they used to do to a guy like that in a place like this?” he said. “They’d be carried out on a stretcher, folks.”
And last month, Trump said he’d like to “hit” speakers at the Democratic National Convention who spoke ill of him.
“The things that were said about me. You know what, I wanted to hit a couple of those speakers so hard,” Trump said. “I was gonna hit this guy so hard, his head would spin. He wouldn’t know what the hell happened.”
It is worth noting that these incidents followed some major public humiliation that exposed his ineptness and dishonesty (widely publicized and disastrous interviews with the WaPo and NYT in early spring, the collective bashing at the DNC, and the latest, his inane “economy” speech on Monday). His outrageous statements thus effectively deflect attention from his glaring lack of substance and basic qualifications for any office, much less that of the American president. But as long as we debate whether he really called for Hillary’s assassination or not, we are not talking about his lack of actionable solutions to the problems he’s promising to cure. Remember, he admitted so himself when he said that the controversy is good for him.
Astonishingly, his jaw-dropping statements about wanting to hit the DNC speakers did not elicit much outrage, suggesting that either we are immune to Trump’s threatening behavior or find it acceptable, maybe both. (That, however, was before The Khan Effect, fully exposing the chasm between the humanity with a conscience and Trump, took hold, which may be the reason for this relative silence.)
It does not help that the media insist on treating the man as if he were a normal candidate, straining for reasonable explanations and equivalencies, as documented by Peter Dreier :
The headlines about Trump’s comment that appeared on-line within hours of his speech reflect how constrained the media are in reporting such an outrageous statement:
- “Trump Appears To Suggest ‘Second Amendment People’ Could Stop Clinton” (NPR),
- “Donald Trump Says ‘Second Amendment People’ Can Stop Hillary Clinton From Curbing Gun Rights” (Wall Street Journal),
- “Trump sparks uproar by saying ‘maybe there is’ a way for ‘2nd Amendment people’ to keep Clinton from naming justices” (Los Angeles Times),
- “Donald Trump Suggests ‘Second Amendment People’ Could Act Against Hillary Clinton” (New York Times),
- “Trump suggests ‘Second Amendment people’ could stop Clinton” (Chicago Tribune),
- “What Ever Could Trump Have Meant With This Joke About ‘Second Amendment People’ and Clinton?” (Slate),
- “Trump ‘Second Amendment’ Quip Seen as Veiled Threat Against Clinton” (NBC)
- “Donald Trump says ‘Second Amendment people’ may be the only check on Clinton judicial appointments” (Washington Post)
- “Trump in trouble over ‘Second Amendment’ remark” (Politico).
All these headlines are accurate but misleading. They don’t explain what he meant or put what he said in political context.
He is right, they don’t. They do illustrate, however, how the narcissistic collusion that’s behind much evil in the world, happens: almost imperceptibly and almost with our full, though usually unwitting, participation.
There is dangerous but predictable logic to Trump’s destructive behavior. And this is just a preview of things to come, should he become our president (may fates help us). Understanding what we are dealing with — a con, one in a long series of many, this time the largest of them all, perpetrated by a psychologically primitive, but skilled in abuse, conscienceless manipulator who’s driven by an insatiable desire for power and adulation — would be helpful to the media as well as the American citizens dealing with the inevitable emotional reactions of being subjected to such abuse (confusion, fear, anger, helplessness, exhaustion). We are being led by our noses; it is up to us to resist this enforced march toward an abyss.
*Not a medical diagnosis.
13 thoughts on “Donny The Gaslighter”
Apparently the secret service has “spoken” to Herr Donny and his staff about this statement. If you or I had said it, we’d be in custody right now. The danger of this man is beyond description. What a vile disgusting thing he is.
LikeLiked by 1 person
He continues doing it because, 1, it works and, 2. he can. It’s worked all his life, getting him to this point and maybe even (gods forbid) to the White House. And people just shrug, cuz “Whadya gonna do? Trump’s gonna Trump.”
Let’s hope his glorious run ends in November.
Thomas Friedman has a good enough (for a Bush apologist and war monger) column in the NYT where he says:
“People are playing with fire here, and there is no bigger flamethrower than Donald Trump. Forget politics; he is a disgusting human being. His children should be ashamed of him. I only pray that he is not simply defeated, but that he loses all 50 states so that the message goes out across the land — unambiguously, loud and clear: The likes of you should never come this way again.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think this shows to what degree American society in general has been browbeaten, dummied down and mentally “disorganized” or confused that it no longer reacts to “Trumpery.” But then there was a time, and it actually still exists, when Americans believed that Ronald Reagan was a “great” president. Then came Dubbya. Now… Trump. Step down, step down, oh what the hell, jump down! I’ll be so much fun wallowing in the mud.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yes, on the brownbeatenness, dumbth, and the consequent disorganization. Like victims of abuse, Americans (but not only) have come to accept and expect this manipulation and mistreatment — and even defend their abusers. A Stockholm Syndrome on a mass scale.
Maybe Trumpism is a wake up call that we need. Because it cannot get any worse, can it. (Can it…?) We shall see.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Unfortunately oh yes, it can get worse, ref., Nazi Germany when the SS came to “arrest” Jews and undesirables, dragging them out into the street and inviting “good” Germans to kick them, pelt them with stones, rotten fruit or anything that came to hand, including yelling epithets at them. Remember these victims included men, women, children, babies, old people, the sick and crippled – no exceptions. We’re talking human nature here. When times reach a point such as these have reached, the first victims are logic and common sense. There is one option left for Americans in dealing with the Janus-faced Clinton-Trump Devil, and that’s to, as of now, completely boycott the entire election process en masse. Total, deliberate, collectively driven satyagraha or non-violent, non cooperation. Not even commenting on it’s corruption. And go further: turn off the TV, ignore all media, consume only basic necessities, stop flying or using public transport; stop attending sports events, the list is endless. That, and only that, would bring the infernal machine to its end, and off the tracks. But for that to happen, you’d have to have a functionally intelligent “commons” or a powerfully charismatic public leader, a Gandhi. A Mandela. The System has made sure such a figure could never arise in the prison-state of Amerika. Instead you will have growing anarchy, police and state security violence, military intervention, prison camps, more mayhem and chaos. And if you (we) are “lucky” we won’t have to look at mushroom clouds.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh, you eternal optimist, you.
And here I was hoping for some dose of soothing denial to counteract my angst.
You are, of course, right — and yes, I’m all too aware of how much worse it can get. I just hope, against hope, that we won’t get there.
I made up a lifelong mantra for myself, perhaps from being paternally abused in childhood: “Expect the worst, that way you’ll never be disappointed.” I do not, ever, use the concept of “hope” though it appears quite often in my short stories. For me there is never any hope: emotionally I cannot deal with it being shattered, I suppose because as a child you do hope that things will improve until finally you have to admit they will not. The flip side is, when something actually goes right, I can get very excited about it. Anything that goes right for me is a gift, never an expectation. I get a lot of gifts. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m sorry to hear about your childhood abuse, Sha’Tara. At the risk of nosy psychologizing, I think that it may perhaps “explain” (not that such an explanation is needed, but other, better words elude me at the moment) your sensitivity and astute understanding of suffering that comes through so clearly in your stories.
The philosophy, such as it is, of low to no expectations seems not only reasonable, but correct to me. It is very un-American, though.(wicked grin)
No expectations was due to upbringing, but it was reinforced by my “Teachers” years later when I was introduced to the concepts of compassion through self-empowerment and detachment. Remembering that, I was very surprised when I began practicing detachment how it dovetailed so well with compassion. It would have seemed a contradiction to me. Anyway, it works.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, relinquishing our attachments, especially the primitive ones (to things and our base drives, possession and control most of all) is freeing. I’m interested in learning how this process comes about in individual people; paradoxically (or not), trauma sometimes enables it IF the developmental constellation is right (i.e., the person has proper inner resources, most importantly empathy). This seems to be you. 🙂
Your “Teachers” sound intriguing. I’d love to meet them some day.
That Trump has made it this far is a very sad testimony of the state of our people.
H.C. with all of her flaws, is so much the better choice for our country and the world over. I kind of like the notion of electing the first woman president right on the heels of electing the first black president (twice!)
But that is not why I would be voting for H.C. I will be voting Hillary for the sole purpose of defeating Trump. After the election I can worry about the flaws of Hillary. The polls are looking better of recent, so there is some hope of keeping this vile bastard out of the office.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, it is a frightening state of affairs to have Trump being seriously considered for president.
A good chunk of the nation is seized by a psychotic rage and propels this dangerous individual to power to satisfy its destructive dictates.