Kleptofascism and You

Inline image

                                             HuffPo’s front page last week. Sigh.

“It is beyond our power to fathom,
Which way the word we utter resonates,
Thus, like a sudden grace that comes upon us,
A gift of empathetic understanding emanates.”

Fyodor Tyutchev (1803–1873),
translated from the Russian by Mikhail N. Epstein

Back in the ancient past of my early high school days, we were required to take a class called Wychowanie obywatelskie. It translates roughly into Civic Education, and it was about educating our youth into civil obedience, as we learned in it about the glorious superiority of communism, the ceaseless devotion of Our Leaders to The Cause,  and our responsibilities as proper members of this Greatest System of Governance on Earth. It was one of the most boring subjects imaginable, if only because everyone knew it was all based on holy — not to be questioned under any circumstances — propagandist lies, and we had to numb ourselves to get through the offensive charade of pretending to believe and absorb them.

During one of the WO classes, our teacher, Mrs. S., a kind woman who executed her duties with benevolent resignation, called upon Kacper, a stocky, taciturn and asocial boy, to explain to our class various systems of government. Kacper stood up, and in a voice of someone annoyed by the interruption to his inner life, delivered this brief and unforgettable summation:

There are two forms of government: democratic and undemocratic. The undemocratic ones are fascism and communism. Democratic ones are all the rest.

This was highly unexpected — these words, and from Kacper, and in those circumstances. The proper response was whatever prettified lies our textbook dictated — and that certainly was not it. Mrs. S’s face flooded with crimson. She asked Kacper to see her after class. Kacper needed some ideological straightening. What form that took, I don’t know; nothing too drastic, I’m sure today, since our required communist purity was not taken seriously by anyone, although we were expected to act otherwise, and yes, sometimes the consequences for consistently and loudly defying it were indeed severe, even deadly. So back then, we couldn’t be certain about the particulars of Kacper’s immediate fate.

Those were pre-Solidarity days, when the rusting shackles of the communist propaganda gripped Poland the strongest, leaving little hope than anything would ever change, and forcing the people to resign themselves — or so it would seem — to their unalterable un-reality.

Unreality, because we were always aware that this system was wrong — our lives were the proof — yet we were prohibited from voicing our thoughts and feelings. The relentless propaganda blasted from the official state-run media sources, the only ones available apart from the illegal and listened to at your own risk Radio Free Europe, told us that everything was great, the current 5-year plan proceeded according to schedule, and our economy prospered, as did our nation. This was not unlike in America, if you replace the 5-year-plan with equally believable official sloganeering about freedom and democracy. Unlike in America, however, most of the citizenry did not fall for these lies.

That’s because our empty stores, the days-long food lines (all family members took shifts waiting in them to get a minimum ration of basic necessities — if one was lucky), and the lack of basic freedoms, including that to openly speak of our hardships,  kept us grounded in real reality, which belied the propagandist boasts. But this real reality was unspeakable; and the obvious chasm between it and the officially approved unreal version of our lives created a sense of solidarity and shared absurdity in people. Forbidden to openly criticize it, we mocked the chasm, and our misery, and the propaganda’s lies — being able to ridicule and laugh at it all, even if only in private and while looking over our shoulders, kept us sane. Mostly.

Those healthy enough to remain maladjusted to the unreality, but unable to laugh and, like everyone else, disallowed to articulate their misery, were internally imprisoned by it.

There were many such internally imprisoned people under communism, but, paradoxically — or not at all — I found out that this problem was even more pervasive and insidious in America and under capitalism in general. Living economically insecure lives, in a violent, increasingly unequal society lacking basic supports and human rights like affordable health care, alienated from themselves and each other, Americans did not seem as free as they were told they were and sometimes even believed.

To be truly free, as Eric Fromm wrote, we need not just freedom from, but also freedom to, and that to part does not mean hedonistic consumerism, but authentic life rooted in (higher) values, which include compassion and care for each other, and/or what some call love. Those values are in short supply in the highly competitive, atomized societies that commodify human beings and fetishize profits.

The authentic, values-based positive freedom, is always the hardest, not in the least since the powers-that-be count on and enforce our conformity to the disordered, valueless status quo, which enables them to implement their dominance- and greed-based schemes unchallenged. As in the communist Poland, so in the capitalist America. Different masters and different means of enforcing this conformity, but similar outcomes — of inherent disrespect for human rights and dignity that lead to fear-infused dependency, dehumanization, much avoidable suffering, and, eventually, rebellion and a collapse of the system.

Authentic freedom is contingent on basic human rights, including equality and justice — economic as well — and “the freedom to exist without having to worry about access to food, shelter, healthcare, and education,” as Belen Fernandez reminds us. Any society that does not secure these rights for its citizens cannot call itself and its people free. That a country like the US does so, and that so many of its people believe it, is a hollow but enduring, to a point, triumph of the propaganda, of the kind that the communists could only dream about. Hollow, because the price of this illusion of freedom comes in the form of lethal consequences; and to a point, because those lethal consequences eventually lead to a revolt and/or wholesale destruction and mayhem.

Their (relative, and these days seriously threatened and rapidly diminishing for most) material comforts, combined with the ceaseless (and unfathomable, for the communist immigrants) consumerist propaganda, have turned Americans into unwitting participants in their own decline prepared for them by the forces of inverted totalitarianism, alive and well in America for decades and culminating now in Trump’s presidency. This is possibly the final chapter of what passes for American “democracy.” It is not clear what will come next.

Dictatorships always fall, but what replaces them is not always better. The Eastern Bloc is a prime example. After the fall of communism, the former Soviet satellites were subjected to looting and pillaging known as the privatization done in the name of globalized corporatocracy. The thieves and psychopaths presiding over this shameless process called it freedom and progress, as they always do while lining their pockets. Those left out of this “freedom-making” soon began to long for the good ol’ days of communism. In Russia and the former Soviet republics, there are many people today who still celebrate Stalin’s life and rule.

Speaking of thieves and psychopaths: Trump’s not even in office yet, but already letting his not-so-inner dictator loose, albeit donning his ill-fitting sheep’s clothing for some special occasions, like the bizarre and laughably manipulative meeting with the “American jewel”, The New York Times. He has already made clear that he will use the office to enrich himself and his uber-wealthy cronies, and to continue settling scores with his enemies, real and imagined, while touring the country from one rally to the next to keep a steady flow of adulation, which he needs as much as oxygen.

His first stop was Indiana where he crowed about his “success” in preventing a loss of several hundred jobs at Carrier. It did not matter that this was as dubious as any other examples of “the art of the deal” from Trump’s life. The point of this sordid and repetitive spectacle is to bask in people’s adoration and at the same time to divert their attention from his government of the billionaires, by the billionaires, and for the billionaires ready to dismantle America as we know it and plunder its coffers. It was no accident that he did that the day after announcing his newest obscene pick of cronies for important administration positions, picks that clearly underscore his kleptofascist agenda.

It is almost certain that the Carrier jobs Trump “saved” will be quietly eliminated within a couple of years, while the bribery, from the taxpayers money, offered to the owners to fund this ego stroke for Trump, will remain in place. This is a true Trumpian Victory (TM), of the kind he warned us about (“We’re going to win, win, win! We’re going to win so much, you’re going to get sick and tired of it.”)

Earlier in the week, he hesitated to condemn the alt-righters who gathered to congratulate themselves on their Trumpian “awakening” and worshipfully hollered “Heil Trump!” during their conference. (All “in a spirit of irony and exuberance,”says their leader, Richard “Watch My Right Pinky!” Spencer. Those Manly Macho Men of Nazism, neo and not, are indeed ironic, but not in the way they imagine.) When Trump finally did address the issue, he pretended to be shocked, shocked, to learn that some unsavory people would invoke his name in such a way.

He has brazenly and unapologetically continued to profiteer from his position as president elect and involve his children in the government matters. When confronted about the unprecedented scope of his conflicts of interests, he brushed it off with, among other blithe responses, a reminder that voters knew about it before they elected him so it does not really matter. No one of sound mind and knowledge of his character defect will take seriously his latest exclamatory tweets (or anything ever that comes out of his mouth and sounds almost normal, reasonable, or decent) about leaving his business behind to MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!

He called several TV bigwigs on the carpet, to abuse and intimidate them, or, as his campaign manager Kellyanne Goebbels Conway said, in her trademark breezily dismissive tone of sweetness and light, to conduct an “excellent meeting” that was “very cordial, candid and honest”. The highlight of that “cordiality” was Trump raging over the unflattering photos that accentuate his multiple chins. The horror. No, really.


[image source]

One almost feels sorry for the media figures, but then one remembers that they raised Trump from obscurity, made him a national figure, and propped him every step of the way to the White House. As the old saying goes, if you lie with the narcissistic psychopaths, you wake up in front of “a f***ing firing squad“. Or sometimes don’t wake up at all.

Just four days ago he proposed jail and revoking citizenship for flag burners, while a day later he was in the self-congratulatory mode over his job saving “intervention” at Carrier, a shameless propagandist move that was being reported by the media for almost a full day without critical commentary or any disclaimers noting its dubiousness.

His most recent eyebrow-raising act — and the day is still young — is the phone conversation with the president of Taiwan, breaking with the long-standing American diplomatic policy not because he’s a champion of freedom and human rights, but because he has an eye on building a luxury resort there. Our media, however, reported this at face value, as if it were a normal, albeit politically questionable, behavior of a normal leader, giving his surrogates ample time to “explain” its necessity and engage in their customary But but but Clinton/Obama! deflections and obfuscations.

American pundits, those with the compromised conscience (as we remember all too well from the Bush era), are already coming to conciliatory terms with this unreality, by removing any remnants of a cognitive dissonance they may have had. After Trump’s embarrassingly manipulative meeting with The NYTDavid Ignatius speculated, hopefully and without any evidence, that Trump’s governing will be different from his election behavior, and gave him advice on continuing (!) wise stewardship; Tom “The Silliest Man on the Planet” Friedman unveiled his self-soothing delusions that President Trump may not be so bad, and Michael Gerson tried to convince himself and maybe even his readers that Trump’s “hypocrisy” is good for America. The horror. No, really.

This is going to be our daily life from now. That’s how it happens, the inevitable full-tilt slide to unreality of life under totalitarian regimes. Little by little, one lie after another, each accepted without murmur, much less protest, by the media, which are either openly complicit in the reality-bending enterprise, or plodding along out of habit, not clear as to what is happening. To be sure, there is not much difference between those motives when it comes to the ultimate outcome.

As our rights will keep eroding, along with our livelihood and prospects for the future, we will be treated to daily doses of unreality meant to convince us that up is down, black is white, and Our Great Leader Trump is fervently working for The Cause, which is making America grate again.

One rule of Trump’s small thumb to remember, now and always, is this:

People with Trump’s character defect never do anything good or even decent. This is not a demonization, this is a fact, difficult as it may be to understand and accept for some. Bereft of a conscience, these individuals are incapable of recognizing higher values and have no internal correspondence for positive affective states associated with them. If anything, they look with contempt upon values and people who try to live their lives accordingly. In their eyes, those people are “suckers” to be used and abused. If something that a man like Trump does appears good or decent, you can be certain that it is either an accident — which he will try to undo ASAP — or part of a larger, nefarious agenda meant to benefit him and harm others. If there is one thing everyone, and especially the members of our media, should know in these times of Trumpism, it is this. It is encouraging to see that some are beginning to get it.

Among other notable exceptions to the disturbing but predictable trend that normalizes the deeply pathological and utterly unacceptable are the writings of Jennifer Rubin of The Washington Post and Charles Blow of The New York Times. And of course those of independent and/or “leftist” journalists.

The silence of Republicans failing to condemn the president elect for his various outrageous misdeeds is deafening, but not surprising. It is not that most of them don’t realize that what he’s doing is wrong; it’s that they want to be part of the looting and pillaging that’s about to commence before they express their qualified (or any) disapproval. They know which way their bread is buttered all too well.  (BTW, just imagine a Democratic president elect acting this way — I know, that’s impossible; but the GOPers would be in 24/7 uproar about it, and rightly so.)

We are witnessing first-hand a crystallization of the American pathocracy, a term created by another Polish psychologist and psychiatrist, Andrzej Łobaczewski, father of ponerology (living under Nazism, and then communism, uniquely sensitizes one to the evils of totalitarianism):

[Pathocracy is] a system of government created by a small pathological minority that takes control over a society of normal people (…) A pathocracy can take many forms and can insinuate itself covertly into any seemingly just system or ideology. As such it can masquerade under the guise of a democracy or theocracy as well as more openly oppressive regimes.

Pathocracy is a structure, as it were, that can be infused with different anti-democratic and anti-human ideologies, one of which is kleptofascism a la Trump, already in full swing, even though the man has not yet been installed in the White House.

One of many pernicious effects of pathocracy is the normalization of a conscienceless, valueless existence and a related pathological conception of the human nature. As Ian Hughes writes in a post promoting his new book “Disordered Minds – How Dangerous Personalities are Destroying Democracy”:

(…) the malign influence of a minority of people with dangerous personality disorders is causing the rest of us to believe in a distorted view of our own nature. We are not an irredeemably violent and greedy species. The majority of people the world over crave peace, justice and freedom from oppression and discrimination. It is only by reducing the influence of the minority with these disorders that we will begin to see this truth more clearly.

Trump’s choices for his cabinet positions confirm what was predicted — that, as all narcissistic psychopaths in power, he would surround himself with people who share his character defect, wealthy men and a few women with “sharp elbows,” as David Brooks euphemistically calls their conscienceless naked ambition and aggression, and a “Let them eat cake” stance toward the less fortunate. Every time Trump nominates a new member of his cabinet, an angel loses its wings.

These choices, and Trump’s “leadership,” such as it may be, guarantee the dismantling of most of what remains decent about America, and quite possibly out in the world. Barbara Kingslover briefly reminds us what’s on the Trumpian chopping block:

Losses are coming at us in these areas: freedom of speech and the press; women’s reproductive rights; affordable healthcare; security for immigrants and Muslims; racial and LGBTQ civil rights; environmental protection; scientific research and education; international cooperation on limiting climate change; international cooperation on anything; any restraints on who may possess firearms; restraint on the upper-class wealth accumulation that’s gutting our middle class; limits on corporate influence over our laws. That’s the opening volley.

A lot is at stake, obviously, which brings me back, in a roundabout way, to Kacper and his unexpected statement, etched in my memory the way emotionally charged experiences always register, preserving their vividness and importance throughout the years. Kacper did not realize it, but his matter-of-fact defiance  woke us up and made us see that if we could openly talk about our shared unreality, not all was lost and perhaps there was hope. And it showed us that what we did and said mattered — we mattered. His courage broke through our complacent stupor, ingrained in us by the totalitarian unreality of our lives.

We are going to need that kind of courage, and the hope that comes with it, to counteract the forces of the post-factual  pathocracy that will steadily engulf this country in the coming years. As truth will be more ferociously than ever erased by the powers-that-be, we need to equally strongly defend it by speaking out. We must oppose and resist the encroachment of Trumpian kleptofascism and its normalization that’s already taking place, by, among other things, rejecting the journalists and politicians who aid and abet this process. We need to protest it, individually and together, with our values in mind. It is the least we can, must do.

Updated on Dec.4, 2016.

Advertisements

28 thoughts on “Kleptofascism and You

    • Thank you, Nan.

      It’s possible Trump will create a level of mayhem that America-at-large will be forced to acknowledge.

      Then again, our capacity for denial and self-delusion is limitless, so perhaps not.

      Liked by 1 person

  1. Did you read Death of the Liberal Class, Emma? Hedges subscribes to Wolin’s vision in that book. There’s a visual synopsis of Hedges’ work on Vimeo and YouTube for anyone interested in Hedges’ response to Emma’s statement, “It is not clear what will come next.”:

    Liked by 1 person

    • Thank you, Hariod, for this excellent video. Depressingly accurate.

      No, I didn’t read “Death,” but I’m familiar with Hedges’ insightful writings from other sources.

      Here’s another look at what may come next: http://www.lrb.co.uk/v38/n23/david-runciman/is-this-how-democracy-ends — although the author does not really give an answer to that particular question. That’s because none have such answers; and the most obvious (and default) one, the self-engineered apocalypse, brought about by our individual and collective deficits of conscience, is too difficult to contemplate and articulate. Denial is preferable, as always.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. I loved Charles M Blow’s article.

    Over here, though, TPTB seem happy for us to moan, as long as our anger is channelled against the targets they prefer- the “liberal metropolitan elite”, immigrants, and the failures of unprivatised public services, all the fault of lazy and incompetent workers who need Free Enterprise to shake them up. Oh, and benefits scroungers, “On Benefits and Proud”.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Yes, Blow blew it out of the water (so to speak). That’s the spirit, I thought reading it.

      Had to look up TPTB. Yes, yes indeed, that’s how they work: deflecting the populus’ attention and anger from their dirty deeds, and scapegoating the vulnerable targets who are even lower on the totem pole.

      This is a defect in the heart of humanity, that desire to appease TPTB, whether human or supernatural, and to displace our pain and suffering on the weakest targets. It is the source of the darkness in our lives, or one of them, I believe, and something we should learn to identify and actively guard against.

      Liked by 2 people

  3. Trump and voting patterns have been extensively analysed so I won’t reiterate all that.

    I’d like to make a more general point. How many people, in any election/referendum, actually vote on grounds of principle, rather than self-interest? It’s not as simple as educated v uneducated, working class v middle class, alientating white unemployed men, women, blacks/latinos, or so-called political correctness.

    Trump has been compared with Brexit because, broadly speaking, there were geographical similarities in areas of unemployment and both have wins that have been described as racist and right-wing.

    We’ve asked people why they voted for or against Brexit. Some who voted for, and live in Gib or Spain, said they would have voted out if they lived in the UK. That is politics at its most personal, ‘What can this vote do for me? I live in Europe, so I’ll vote in. I’ll ignore the UK problems’. Same with Trump voters. Not interested in poorer people (although some of them are poor), or for improving services, free health care at point of delivery, education likewise, subsidised housing, minimum income etc etc. The essence though, is people voting for what they (mistakenly?) hope should improve their lot. They don’t care about the vulnerable and needy in our societies who are struggling more and more. Not important. Although they may be heading there.

    And when people think they have been shit on from a very grand height, add in all the other racist (Obama), misognynist (Clinton), nationalistic/fascist (America great again, Islam, expel all Muslims) factors, people just vote for change that they *think* will benefit them.

    I hope your scenario doesn’t pan out. But how many middle classes seriously protest? And are disruptive? They have mortgages and jobs FFS. Principles are all well and good but we don’t want to end up on the street. We had a strike vote in my union, three of us out of twenty or thirty voted to strike.

    But back to your schoolfriend’s comment and democracy. Increasingly we are governed by kakistocracies, not democracies. That we live in democracies is a fallacy. Trump and his thugs are the epitome of a kakistocratic government.

    Liked by 2 people

  4. Authentic freedom is contingent on basic human rights, including equality and justice…

    You get it. So few do.

    I think living under a totalitarian regime reveals just how important, how central, this understanding is to dealing with and addressing all kinds of policies and programs and judging them on this metric. When we move away from this metric, we move towards undermining respect for shared human rights, shared equality, shared justice of the people, by the people FOR the people. In the States, this understanding is cleverly and dishonestly called ‘communism’ or – even worse – ‘socialism’.

    There’s the problem.

    Liked by 3 people

  5. “We need to protest it, individually and together, with our values in mind.” The greatest mistake and pitfall of “thinking” people, who are the very few, is to believe, all evidence to the contrary, that the majority “out there” thinks like them and understands what’s going on and actually gives a s**t! All it takes to be instantly disabused is to OBSERVE the real sheeple in action, every day, in every way. Values? For most people I observe, and I’m an “on the street among the public” common type kind of person, life is getting away with something, usually breaking the law in some fashion the cops have learned to carefully avoid dealing with, leaving the dirty work to private security; being gross, crass, demanding, uncaring, loud (and LOUDER); blaming, bitching, taking and consuming, make that CONSUMING. Violence RULES the minds of the sheeple, they revel in it. I observe the reality, and the exceptions to the reality. Would it surprise anyone to learn that the reality is grossly negative, the exceptions increasingly rarer? (Quote from the movie, Holy man: “Why do we yawn at creation and thrill as destruction?” Ah, but stating this isn’t politically correct, is it. The head in the sands of hope approach isn’t going to work for the “I believe people are learning, trying to be better, more aware, more concerned” New Agey lovey-dovey we’re all in this together small clique preaching to its very small converted choir. Trump demonstrated that what the sheeple want is more of all those negative things we would wring our hands over. They elected what was most closely associated with their way of looking at life. Yes, we can talk about ponerology in government, banking, religion; pathocracy, sociopathy, kleptocracy, and these new ones on me: kleptofascism and kakistocratic government. But really, it’s “the people” who want it this way, it’s really their choice, their preference, and it’s actually always been so. Until it becomes unbearable and then they grab the pitchforks and storm the Bastille. And then, during or after a blood bath and some serious purges, a Washington-Napoleon-Lenin-Hitler-Mao-Trump emerges to “make the land of (put whatever name you want here) great again. If you can’t change “the people” (and they won’t read to above article, or anything resembling it we know this) then you can’t change the leadership. What can you change, if change is deemed necessary? Yourself. No one else and nothing else. We’re not in this together, I’m in this by myself, for myself. We can discuss how we go about changing our own ways, beliefs, traditions, and how we act as a result of those changes within ourselvs but the moment we “organize” to make change (read: force change) we’re jumping from the Titanic to the Lusitania. My take.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. You really are a wonderful writer. Logical, well reasoned, with the right amount of punch and wit.

    <em?People with Trump’s character defect never do anything good or even decent. This is not a demonization, this is a fact, difficult as it may be to understand and accept for some. Bereft of a conscience, these individuals are incapable of recognizing higher values and have no internal correspondence for positive affective states associated with them.

    This passage really connected with me. When people pass of his comments on the bus as something from the past, or any of his other past deeds, they don’t seem to realize that this is a fairly old man…he isn’t going to change, and more importantly he hasn’t changed from the man he always was. He is who he is. And who he is, is someone void of actual empathy. The good that he has done has been on a whim, a publicity matter to elevate his status. In fact I’d argue if there was any good at it him, it would have been in his youth. His long life of privilege and incredible financial power has corrupted his plastic brain into something even more detached from the world. He’s out of his league right now, and running on instinct, and his instincts have nothing to do with actually helping people, it’s about helping himself.

    Liked by 2 people

  7. Re. Flag burning
    Here’s my cynical take on how this will progress:

    Burning the Flag = bad
    Criticising the office of the President = bad
    Criticising the President = bad
    Linking to articles that criticise the President = bad
    Distributing material that criticises the President = bad
    All the above retrospectively for a few years = bad

    If it ever gets close to that stage – and it would probably go drip drip drip and then suddenly, perhaps under the pretext of terrorism or the inevitable foreign wars – and u can get out of the country and feel safe u could put these thoughts into a PDF that obliquely names the Great Leader and make it Creative Commons.

    Seems crazy writing this but the slow downward slide of America and my new-found knowledge of how Ps work (personal experience, endless reading) suddenly makes it seem all too plausible.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Yes, it is plausible, Richard. I lived under such conditions; millions of people around the globe still do. And it is frighteningly easy to impose them on seemingly “healthy” societies. Of course this shows that such societies were not healthy to begin with, but that is the human norm at this time of our development. Somehow we cannot transcend our all too glaring limitations that make us so susceptible to influences of the pathological characters and their crazy whims.

      And yes, it’s usually the drip, drip, drip — and boom! kind of thing. We should make it an official paradigm: The Drip, Drip, Drip — and Boom! Theory of Social De-evolution 😉 Though, seriously, this is really how these things happen, in both directions — toward and away from totalitarianism.

      Like

  8. Pingback: See No Evil | good marriage central*

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s